Consultants are periodically faced with whether to agree to do exactly what a client wants versus proposing what a client truly needs.
The dilemma is clear: If a consultant pushes back on the client’s request or suggests something different, the engagement opportunity might be lost. On the other hand, if the consultant believes the client’s request is unwise, unsafe, risky, illegal, or unethical and agrees anyway, the consultant will be complicit in a bad decision, an unsuccessful outcome, and the consequences.
Most situations that reflect this dilemma don’t reach the unsafe, unethical, or illegal range. Still, they often present pitting a client’s request—which may not be in their own best interest due to lack of expertise–against the expert consultant’s recommendation.
While there is a chance that executing the client’s wishes will ultimately achieve a good outcome, more likely, it won’t.
As far as assessing and accepting blame, the consultant can always hide behind, “Well, I just did what you asked.” While this logic might appear to be a safe position, if a failure results, no one wins. Both the client’s business and the consultant’s reputation are damaged.
Thus, the dilemma: does the consultant sublimate their expert judgment and execute to the client’s wishes if they are unsound, insist on a different course of action, or simply walk away?